Von Ax Halstead v. Halstead

The Superior Court of New York City

Von Ax Halstead v. Halstead

3 Misc. 618

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJuly 1, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Misc. 618 (Von Ax Halstead v. Halstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Von Ax Halstead v. Halstead, 3 Misc. 618 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There were certain characteristics of the application below which justify the decision that was made. It was uncertain that the letters contained anything that would benefit the defendants, if offered as evidence. Indeed, the contents are undisclosed. The application does not avow specifically that the contents, if learned, will be offered in testimony upon the trial.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There were certain characteristics of the application below which justify the decision that was made. It was uncertain that the letters contained anything that would benefit the defendants, if offered as evidence. Indeed, the contents are undisclosed. The application does not avow specifically that the contents, if learned, will be offered in testimony upon the trial.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Misc. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/von-ax-halstead-v-halstead-nysuperctnyc-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack