Von Ax Halstead v. Halstead

3 Misc. 618
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided July 1, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There were certain characteristics of the application below which justify the decision that was made. It was uncertain that the letters contained anything that would benefit the defendants, if offered as evidence. Indeed, the contents are undisclosed. The application does not avow specifically that the contents, if learned, will be offered in testimony upon the trial.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Von Ax Halstead v. Halstead, 3 Misc. 618 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

3 Misc. 618 (Von Ax Halstead v. Halstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related