Vomvoris's Case
This text of 277 N.E.2d 831 (Vomvoris's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The self-insurer appeals from a final decree awarding the employee compensation for total and permanent incapacity, claiming that an expert witness for the employee, a professional psychologist and vocational consultant, was permitted to give an opinion based on hearsay not in evidence, contrary to our decisions. Commonwealth v. Russ, 232 Mass. 58, 73-74. Charron’s Case, 331 Mass. 519, 523. Haley’s Case, 356 Mass. 678, 681-683. Testimony by medical doctors amply supported the findings of the single member of the board that the employee was totally and permanently incapacitated and that the incapacity was causally related to his industrial injury. There is nothing to indicate that the single member regarded the psychologist’s testimony as anything but cumulative. The error, if any, was not prejudicial. Indrisano’s Case, 307 Mass. 520, 523. Caccamo’s Case, 316 Mass. 358, 362-363. McLean’s Case, 323 Mass. 35, 39. Cherwinski’s Case, 344 Mass. 761.
Decree affirmed.
Costs and expenses of appeal are to be determined by the single justice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 N.E.2d 831, 360 Mass. 874, 1972 Mass. LEXIS 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vomvoriss-case-mass-1972.