Volz v. Volz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Volz v. Volz

513 N.W.2d 284, 245 Neb. 340, 1994 Neb. LEXIS 62

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 11, 1994

DocketNo. S-92-838

StatusPublished

This text of 513 N.W.2d 284 (Volz v. Volz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Volz v. Volz, 513 N.W.2d 284, 245 Neb. 340, 1994 Neb. LEXIS 62 (Neb. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this appeal of a dissolution action, the petitioner-appellant, Linda Gail Volz, challenges the district court’s determination that the property settlement agreement she and the respondent-appellee, Gary Joseph Volz, executed [341]*341was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable and the district court’s resulting division of the property.

From our de novo review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in either of these respects.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this appeal of a dissolution action, the petitioner-appellant, Linda Gail Volz, challenges the district court’s determination that the property settlement agreement she and the respondent-appellee, Gary Joseph Volz, executed [341]*341was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable and the district court’s resulting division of the property.

From our de novo review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in either of these respects.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 N.W.2d 284, 245 Neb. 340, 1994 Neb. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/volz-v-volz-neb-1994.