Volz v. Volz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Volz v. Volz

513 N.W.2d 284, 245 Neb. 340, 1994 Neb. LEXIS 62

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided March 11, 1994·No. No. S-92-838·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this appeal of a dissolution action, the petitioner-appellant, Linda Gail Volz, challenges the district court’s determination that the property settlement agreement she and the respondent-appellee, Gary Joseph Volz, executed [341] was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable and the district court’s resulting division of the property.

From our de novo review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in either of these respects.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this appeal of a dissolution action, the petitioner-appellant, Linda Gail Volz, challenges the district court’s determination that the property settlement agreement she and the respondent-appellee, Gary Joseph Volz, executed [341] was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable and the district court’s resulting division of the property.

From our de novo review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in either of these respects.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Volz v. Volz, 513 N.W.2d 284, 245 Neb. 340, 1994 Neb. LEXIS 62 (Neb. 1994).

Pincite

513 N.W.2d 284 (Volz v. Volz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.