Volusia County Council on Aging v. Robinson
This text of 589 So. 2d 1026 (Volusia County Council on Aging v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The employer/carrier appeal an order of the judge of compensation claims awarding the claimant temporary total disability (TTD) benefits from May 9, 1990 through October 1, 1990, and finding the employer/carrier responsible for attorney’s fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The employer/carrier first argue that the judge erred in finding that claimant reached maximum medical improvement (MMI) on October 1, 1990. There is competent, substantial evidence to support this finding by the judge, and we affirm that portion of the order.
We agree, however, with the argument of the employer/carrier that the judge erred in awarding an attorney’s fee to be paid by the carrier in this case. The appel-lee has conceded that the order was not intended to determine entitlement to an attorney fee, but was intended to reserve jurisdiction for determination of both entitlement and amount. We reverse the order to the extent it determines entitlement to an attorney fee and remand for further proceedings.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
589 So. 2d 1026, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11916, 1991 WL 253343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/volusia-county-council-on-aging-v-robinson-fladistctapp-1991.