Volunteer Police Officers

43 Pa. D. & C. 611
CourtPennsylvania Department of Justice
DecidedJanuary 16, 1942
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Pa. D. & C. 611 (Volunteer Police Officers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Department of Justice primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Volunteer Police Officers, 43 Pa. D. & C. 611 (Pa. 1942).

Opinion

Rutter, Deputy Attorney General,

By your communication of December 30, 1941, you requested us to advise you upon the following questions raised in connection with the Act of July 18,1917, P. L. 1062,35 PS § §1421-1424, an act providing for the appointment by the Governor of volunteer police officers during time of war.

The questions submitted by you were as follows:

1. Must a volunteer police officer wear a uniform while engaged in police service?

2. May a volunteer police officer carry a firearm?

3. If a volunteer police officer is injured or incapacitated in the performance of his duty, who or what agency, if any, is liable for: (<x) Workmen’s compensation; (b) or other liability?

4. What fee, if any, may be charged upon the issuance of a commission to a volunteer police officer: (a.) By the Secretary of the Commonwealth; (6) by the municipality or industry which requests the appoint[612]*612ment and commission of such officer; and (c) if a fee is chargeable, by whom shall it be paid?

5. Shall the recorder of deeds collect and remit to the Commonwealth the sum of 50 cents for each commission received by him and filed in his office under said act?

6. May nonresidents of Pennsylvania be appointed and commissioned as volunteer police officers?

7. May a sheriff of a county certify on behalf of an industry to the need for an appointment of and commission to a volunteer police officer?

As a result of your f oregoing inquiries we issued and directed to you Formal Opinion no. 409, dated January 8, 1942, advising you concerning certain of the foregoing questions. Said opinion is hereby withdrawn, and you will consider yourself no longer bound by it. This opinion is substituted for Formal Opinion no. 409.

We shall now take up your questions in the order given above.

The first three and seventh questions asked by you we must decline to answer for the reason that you would be neither bound nor protected by any answers we might give to them.

Your question no. 4, namely, what fee, if any, may be charged upon the issuance of a commission to a volunteer police officer: (a) By the Secretary of the Commonwealth; (6) by the municipality or industry which requests the appointment and commission of such officer; and (c) if a fee is chargeable, by whom shall it be paid, we shall answer.

The Act of July 18, 1917, supra, contains no provision relating to any fee to be paid to any person or official by anyone upon the issuance of a commission to a volunteer policeman. Therefore, in the absence of other pertinent and controlling legislation, no fee may be charged.

Section 1 of the Act of June 8, 1923, P. L. 685, as [613]*613amended by the Act of May 17, 1933, P. L. 800, 71 PS §803, provides in part:

“The fees of the Secretary of the Commonwealth, for the use of the State, shall be as follows:.

“Each commission for railroad, mining, or other police, five dollars.”

Volunteer police provided for in the Act of July 18, 1917, are not in the same category as, nor are they, railroad police. Railroad police are expressly created by the Act of February 27, 1865, P. L. 225, 38 PS §§31-36. The oaths of such police must be recorded by recorders of deeds and filed in the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth. Commissions of volunteer police need not be recorded nor need they be filed in the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth. All that the Act of July 18,1917, requires is that the oaths and commissions of volunteer police be filed in the office of the recorder of deeds. It is not necessary, therefore, to produce revenue under the act wherewith to defray expenses in the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth because no unusual expenses would be incurred by that office in connection with the act.

The descriptive words “mining police” used in the Act of June 8,1923, P. L. 685, supra, as amended, apparently refer, if they refer to anything, to “industrial police” formerly authorized by the Act of April 18, 1929, P. L. 546, 38 PS §§1-14, for there are no “mining police” as such. However, said Act of April 18, 1929, was repealed by the Act of June 15, 1935, P. L. 348, and “industrial police” no longer exist.

The words “other police”, used in the Act of June 8, 1923, supra, also probably referred to industrial police. This must be true because no commissions are issued by the Governor or through the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth to any police (excepting volunteer police under the Act of July 18, 1917) other than railroad police.

[614]*614Railroad police are primarily a peacetime organization. Volunteer police under the Act of July 18, 1917, are a wartime body. They are, in the words of the preamble of the act itself, a “volunteer police force to prevent injury and destruction to the various industries of the Commonwealth by enemies of the Nation . . . during the time this Nation is at war”.

We are not dealing here with the usual type of commission issued; we are not involved with a regularly organized peacetime police force; we are, rather, construing legislation creating a volunteer police force during time of National peril and war, such force to be composed of patriotic citizens who volunteer their services for the defense of their country and State. To our minds, the General Assembly never contemplated exacting any fee whatever for the issuance of commissions to volunteer policemen. The Act of July 18,1917, is a grant of necessary power by a grateful Sovereign to those who volunteer in its defense in time of war. It is not a revenue-producing statute; it is a war measure for National defense. We conclude, therefore, that no fee may be charged upon the issuance of a commission to a volunteer policeman.

Your question no. 5, namely, shall the recorder of deeds collect and remit to the Commonwealth the sum of 50 cents for each commission received by him and filed in his office under said act, we shall also answer.

Our research discloses certain legislation pertaining to the collection and remission of fees by recorders of deeds to the Commonwealth, on commissions received by such recorders and entered of record by them. Section 5 of the Act of April 11,1840, P. L. 294, 42 PS §86, provides that commissions of justices of the peace and aldermen shall be entered of record by the recorder of deeds of the proper county. The Act of July 18, 1917, supra, does not require that commissions of volunteer police officers be recorded. It simply requires, in section 2 thereof, that the certificates of appointment of [615]*615such police officers, that is, their commissions, shall be filed in the office of the recorder of deeds. It follows from this that such commissions are not recorded at all in the office of the recorder of deeds.

Section 55 of the Act of May 2,1929, P. L. 1278, 16 PS §55, provides that every county officer receiving a commission from the Governor shall deliver the same to the recordér of deeds by whom it shall be recorded at the expense of such officer. This section does not apply to volunteer police officers under the legislation being discussed for the reason that such officers are not county officers.

Section 613 of the Act of April 9,1929, P. L.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Pa. D. & C. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/volunteer-police-officers-padeptjust-1942.