Volton Crumpton v. United States

322 F.2d 1020
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 9, 1963
Docket17464_1
StatusPublished

This text of 322 F.2d 1020 (Volton Crumpton v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Volton Crumpton v. United States, 322 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion to vacate his sentence was denied by the District Court, and he was refused leave to appeal in forma pauperis on the ground that the appeal would be frivolous. Notice of appeal has been filed by him, and he now makes application here for leave to be permitted to proceed with the appeal in forma pauperis.

As a matter of public interest in not having an attack upon a criminal sentence left standing unterminated on the court records, the appeal pending from appellant’s filing of notice of appeal will be permitted to be docketed without payment of fee, but the appeal must be dismissed as frivolous.

The files and records of the case, including the transcript of appellant’s arraignment and sentencing proceedings, conclusively show, as the District Court’s Memorandum and Order meticulously demonstrate, that appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 F.2d 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/volton-crumpton-v-united-states-ca8-1963.