Volponi v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

159 N.Y.S. 1148

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, because of error in the charge at folio 450. The action was brought under the Labor Law. Though the hook in question was perfect mechanically, the question whether it was defective, considered in the light of its use, was to he decided by the jury. Lipstein v. Provident Loan Society, 154 App. Div. 732, 139 N. Y. Supp. 799; Sullivan v. Greenhut-Siegel, Cooper Co., 155 App. Div. 391, 140 N. Y. Supp. 263. Jenks, P. J., and Thomas, Carr, Stapleton, and Putnam, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Volponi v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 159 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

159 N.Y.S. 1148 (Volponi v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lipstein v. Provident Loan Society of New York
154 A.D. 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Sullivan v. Greenhut-Siegel, Cooper Co.
155 A.D. 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)