Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford
This text of 933 A.2d 722 (Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 188 (AC 27332), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. In interpreting General Statutes § 46a-82 (e), did the Appellate Court properly hold that the statute of limitations began to run on the last day the plaintiff worked?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that summary judgment was inappropriate because (a) there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding the notice of termination and (b) there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding pretext?”
SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
933 A.2d 722, 284 Conn. 920, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vollemans-v-town-of-wallingford-conn-2007.