Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford

933 A.2d 722, 284 Conn. 920, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 442
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 26, 2007·No. SC 17974·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 188 (AC 27332), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. In interpreting General Statutes § 46a-82 (e), did the Appellate Court properly hold that the statute of limitations began to run on the last day the plaintiff worked?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that summary judgment was inappropriate because (a) there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding the notice of termination and (b) there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding pretext?”

SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford, 933 A.2d 722, 284 Conn. 920, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 442 (Colo. 2007).

933 A.2d 722 (Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford
956 A.2d 579 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)