Volle v. Cook

Supreme Court of Kansas

Volle v. Cook

83 P. 1116, 73 Kan. 793, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 341

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMarch 10, 1906

DocketNo. 14,325

StatusPublished

This text of 83 P. 1116 (Volle v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Volle v. Cook, 83 P. 1116, 73 Kan. 793, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 341 (kan 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The action of the district court from which this proceeding in error arises related to a boundary which it was claimed had been fixed by parol and acquiesced in so as to bind the parties and their subsequent grantees. The only question is if the evidence supports the judgment of the trial court. A careful canvass of the record leads to the conclusion that the evidence is sufficient for that purpose, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The action of the district court from which this proceeding in error arises related to a boundary which it was claimed had been fixed by parol and acquiesced in so as to bind the parties and their subsequent grantees. The only question is if the evidence supports the judgment of the trial court. A careful canvass of the record leads to the conclusion that the evidence is sufficient for that purpose, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 P. 1116, 73 Kan. 793, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/volle-v-cook-kan-1906.