Volkmann v. Meadowbrook National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Volkmann v. Meadowbrook National Bank

43 A.D.2d 868, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5879

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 868 (Volkmann v. Meadowbrook National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Volkmann v. Meadowbrook National Bank, 43 A.D.2d 868, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 5, 1973, as, upon reconsideration, adhered to the original decision denying her application for a general preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion for a general preference granted. In our opinion, the uneontroverted claim of a permanent partial disability could warrant an evaluation in excess of the monetary jurisdiction of the Civil Court of the City of New York and a general preference should have been granted. Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 5, 1973, as, upon reconsideration, adhered to the original decision denying her application for a general preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion for a general preference granted. In our opinion, the uneontroverted claim of a permanent partial disability could warrant an evaluation in excess of the monetary jurisdiction of the Civil Court of the City of New York and a general preference should have been granted. Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 868, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/volkmann-v-meadowbrook-national-bank-nyappdiv-1974.