Volk v. Chrysler, LLC

356 S.W.3d 884, 2012 WL 123287, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 47
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 2012·No. ED 96876·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ray Volk (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying him disability benefits following the conclusion of his employment with Chrysler, LLC (“Employer”). Claimant argues the Commission erred in discounting his testimony and that of his medical expert and that Claimant proffered substantial, competent evidence linking his work activities to his resulting carpal tunnel syndrome.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Volk v. Chrysler, LLC, 356 S.W.3d 884, 2012 WL 123287, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 47 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

356 S.W.3d 884 (Volk v. Chrysler, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.