Volentine v. Bladen

16 S.C.L. 9
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 15, 1823
StatusPublished

This text of 16 S.C.L. 9 (Volentine v. Bladen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Volentine v. Bladen, 16 S.C.L. 9 (S.C. 1823).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court r was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gantt.

The plaintiff in this case hired her son (a boy under age) to foe defendant for one year. 0y remained from January until June, when for some cause foe hoy left foe service'of foe defendant.

This action was brought by the mother, to recover foe value of her son’s services for the time he remained-

[10]*10I see nothing in the contract which tends to impair the Correctness of- the construction given tu it by the' presiding Judge. _. The contract was made with the mother and for her benefit; consequently she might rightfully and legally recover the wages secured to he paid by the contract, which the defendant had entered into with her.

The nonsuit moved for, is refused..

Richardson, Johnson, Colcock, Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 S.C.L. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/volentine-v-bladen-sc-1823.