VOLEK v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

VOLEK v. State

21 So. 3d 162, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16839, 2009 WL 3763039

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 12, 2009

Docket4D08-1903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 So. 3d 162 (VOLEK v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

VOLEK v. State, 21 So. 3d 162, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16839, 2009 WL 3763039 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Martin Volek seeks review of orders that denied his motion for postconviction relief. We reverse and remand for further proceedings on one issue.

Volek alleged below that his counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him of the possible defenses of insanity and involuntary intoxication based on his use of prescription antipsychotic medication. *163 However, Volek did not allege any facts demonstrating how mere use of the medication entitled him to either of those defenses. Thus, the circuit court found the claim legally insufficient.

Consequently, Volek should be given at least one opportunity to amend his claim on this issue. Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007). Pursuant to Spera, we reverse the circuit court’s summary denial on this issue only and remand for the court to permit the amendment. We affirm the denial of all other claims.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

POLEN, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI