Voke v. Archer
249 A.D. 795, 293 N.Y.S. 500, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6036
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1936·Published
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Mitchill v. Lath (247 N. Y. 377); Love v. Hamel (59 App. Div. 360), and Costello v. Eddy (12 N. Y. Supp. 236; affd., 128 N. Y. 650). All concur except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law. (The judgment awards damages to plaintiff in an action to recover purchase price of plaintiff’s share in an automobile business.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Voke v. Archer, 249 A.D. 795, 293 N.Y.S. 500, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
249 A.D. 795 (Voke v. Archer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Costello v. . Eddy
29 N.E. 146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)
Mitchill v. Lath
160 N.E. 646 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Love v. Hamel
59 A.D. 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Costello v. Eddy
12 N.Y.S. 236 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)