Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Voisin v. Voisin

Voisin v. Voisin

794 So. 2d 649, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7475, 2001 WL 574852
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 30, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-3926
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 794 So. 2d 649 (Voisin v. Voisin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Voisin v. Voisin, 794 So. 2d 649, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7475, 2001 WL 574852 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Carol Voisin disputes a child support order that imputed income to her at a level she contended she had never earned. Because the record does not include a transcript of the evidentiary hearing or a stipulated statement of the evidence and proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), we are compelled to affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Lynn v. Allstar Steakhouse & Sports Bar, Inc., 736 So.2d 722 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rabelo v. Rabelo
92 So. 3d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
BARRON CHASE SECURITIES, INC. v. Moser
794 So. 2d 649 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
794 So. 2d 649, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7475, 2001 WL 574852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voisin-v-voisin-fladistctapp-2001.