Voisin v. Voisin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Voisin v. Voisin

794 So. 2d 649, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7475, 2001 WL 574852

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 30, 2001·No. No. 2D00-3926·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Carol Voisin disputes a child support order that imputed income to her at a level she contended she had never earned. Because the record does not include a transcript of the evidentiary hearing or a stipulated statement of the evidence and proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), we are compelled to affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Lynn v. Allstar Steakhouse & Sports Bar, Inc., 736 So.2d 722 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Carol Voisin disputes a child support order that imputed income to her at a level she contended she had never earned. Because the record does not include a transcript of the evidentiary hearing or a stipulated statement of the evidence and proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), we are compelled to affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Lynn v. Allstar Steakhouse & Sports Bar, Inc., 736 So.2d 722 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Voisin v. Voisin, 794 So. 2d 649, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7475, 2001 WL 574852 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

794 So. 2d 649 (Voisin v. Voisin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related