Voineag v. Kline

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Voineag v. Kline

831 So. 2d 783, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17757, 2002 WL 31697032

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 4, 2002

DocketNo. 4D02-2170

StatusPublished

This text of 831 So. 2d 783 (Voineag v. Kline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Voineag v. Kline, 831 So. 2d 783, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17757, 2002 WL 31697032 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

KLEIN, J.

Appellee plaintiff filed this personal injury suit in Palm Beach County alleging that an auto accident occurred in Jupiter, Florida. About six months later a witness established, for the first time to the knowledge of the defendant, that the accident had occurred in Martin County, not Palm Beach County. There was no other venue basis for bringing the action in Palm Beach County.

Defendants promptly moved to change venue to Martin County. Although plaintiff recognized that venue was not proper in Palm Beach County, she persuaded the trial court that venue had been waived. Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So.2d 100 (Fla.1955).

A waiver is the intentional or voluntary relinquishment of a known right. Hill v. Ray Carter Auto Sales, Inc., 745 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We conclude that under the facts of this case, where defendants moved to change venue as soon as they discovered venue was improper, defendants did not waive their right to have venue changed. Reversed.

STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI