Voiler v. Fan & Bill's, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Voiler v. Fan & Bill's, Inc.

165 So. 2d 432, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4417

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 1964

DocketNo. 63-872

StatusPublished

This text of 165 So. 2d 432 (Voiler v. Fan & Bill's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Voiler v. Fan & Bill's, Inc., 165 So. 2d 432, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4417 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants proceeded under § 55.24, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. and urge error in the refusal of the Court to appoint a receiver thereunder. An examination of the record reveals that the appellants failed to substantially comply with the requirements of this statute in that their petition was unverified and was not directed to the “circuit court sitting in chancery”. We must decline therefore to hold the trial judge in error upon a refusal to grant the relief requested.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants proceeded under § 55.24, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. and urge error in the refusal of the Court to appoint a receiver thereunder. An examination of the record reveals that the appellants failed to substantially comply with the requirements of this statute in that their petition was unverified and was not directed to the “circuit court sitting in chancery”. We must decline therefore to hold the trial judge in error upon a refusal to grant the relief requested.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 So. 2d 432, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voiler-v-fan-bills-inc-fladistctapp-1964.