Voigt v. Voigt
This text of 505 So. 2d 626 (Voigt v. Voigt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We agree with the appellant that the trial court erred in holding her in contempt for refusing to return certain personalty belonging to the husband without conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine her present ability to comply with the court's order. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985).
The order of contempt is reversed, and this cause is remanded for the trial court with directions to conduct the requisite evi-dentiary hearing.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
505 So. 2d 626, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1021, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voigt-v-voigt-fladistctapp-1987.