Voigt v. Voigt
505 So. 2d 626, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1021, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7769
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 1987·No. No. 86-2123·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We agree with the appellant that the trial court erred in holding her in contempt for refusing to return certain personalty belonging to the husband without conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine her present ability to comply with the court's order. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985).
The order of contempt is reversed, and this cause is remanded for the trial court with directions to conduct the requisite evi-dentiary hearing.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Voigt v. Voigt, 505 So. 2d 626, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1021, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7769 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
505 So. 2d 626 (Voigt v. Voigt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Welsh v. Martinez
M.D. Florida, 2023
Leo v. Leo
79 So. 3d 188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)