Voigt, Jr. v. Hegge

116 P.2d 304, 10 Wash. 2d 723
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 22, 1941
DocketNo. 28443.
StatusPublished

This text of 116 P.2d 304 (Voigt, Jr. v. Hegge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Voigt, Jr. v. Hegge, 116 P.2d 304, 10 Wash. 2d 723 (Wash. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, William Voight, Jr., has made application to this court for a writ of certiorari directed to the clerk of the superior court for Cowlitz county requiring her to make available to this court certain records of the superior court for use in a habeas corpus proceeding concurrently instituted by petitioner.

The facts pertaining to the present application and our reasons for denying it appear at length in the case of Voigt v. Mahoney, ante p. 157, 116 P. (2d) 300, and require no further, or separate, discussion here.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Voigt v. Mahoney
116 P.2d 300 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 P.2d 304, 10 Wash. 2d 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voigt-jr-v-hegge-wash-1941.