Voigt Brewing Co. v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 390 (Voigt Brewing Co. v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To vacate an order setting aside a stipulation for discontinuance, signed by the plaintiff in a pending suit, and by defendant’s (relator’s) attorney.
Granted December 18, 1894, with costs against plaintiff in the court below, on the ground that the lien of an attorney does not attach until the rendition of judgment, and that prior to that he cannot prevent his client from settling the controversy and discontinuing the suit, and that the question of alleged fraud in securing a settlement cannot be tried upon affidavits.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 390, 103 McGrath 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voigt-brewing-co-v-circuit-judge-mich-1894.