Vogt v. State

2016 ND 48
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 3, 2016
Docket20150279
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2016 ND 48 (Vogt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vogt v. State, 2016 ND 48 (N.D. 2016).

Opinion

Filed 3/3/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 48

Jason James Vogt, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20150279

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable John Charles Irby, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

David N. Ogren, Grand Forks Public Defender Office, 405 Bruce Ave., Ste. 101, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for plaintiff and appellant.

Tristan J. Van de Streek, Cass County Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for defendant and appellee.

Vogt v. State

[¶1] Jason Vogt appeals from a district court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief.  In 2015, Vogt pled guilty to one count of gross sexual imposition, a class A felony.  Vogt applied for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel and seeking to withdraw his guilty plea.  After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied his application.  Vogt appealed, arguing the district court erred because his attorney’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and he was prejudiced, among other things, by his trial counsel’s failure to (1) investigate the credibility of the two victims; and (2) advise him of the effect two victims would have on his risk assessment.  We conclude the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] The judgment incorrectly designates, at paragraph four, the Honorable Norman John C. Irby.  We remand for the district court to correct the judgment to accurately reflect the Honorable John C. Irby.

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vogt v. State
2022 ND 163 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2022)
State v. Vogt
2019 ND 236 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 ND 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogt-v-state-nd-2016.