Vogt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vogt v. State

581 So. 2d 250, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6667, 1991 WL 115597

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 1991

DocketNo. 90-01778

StatusPublished

This text of 581 So. 2d 250 (Vogt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vogt v. State, 581 So. 2d 250, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6667, 1991 WL 115597 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the first issue, we affirm on the basis of Quarterman v. State, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1988) and Smith v. State, 529 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1988). As to the second issue, we affirm special condition 27 of Mr. Vogt’s probation, as it reasonably relates to the crimes for which he was convicted and is not unreasonably vague or restrictive, given the facts of this case. Conversely, we strike special condition 6 because it has no reasonable relation to Mr. Vogt’s offenses or his rehabilitation.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As to the first issue, we affirm on the basis of Quarterman v. State, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1988) and Smith v. State, 529 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1988). As to the second issue, we affirm special condition 27 of Mr. Vogt’s probation, as it reasonably relates to the crimes for which he was convicted and is not unreasonably vague or restrictive, given the facts of this case. Conversely, we strike special condition 6 because it has no reasonable relation to Mr. Vogt’s offenses or his rehabilitation.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

581 So. 2d 250, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6667, 1991 WL 115597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogt-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack