Vogt v. Bridges
100 S.E. 642, 24 Ga. App. 244, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 526
This text of 100 S.E. 642 (Vogt v. Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vogt v. Bridges, 100 S.E. 642, 24 Ga. App. 244, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 526 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
1. There is no merit in the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions; and accordingly it is denied.
2. Under the facts of the case the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 642, 24 Ga. App. 244, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogt-v-bridges-gactapp-1919.