Vogler v. Branch Erections Company, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 17, 2002
DocketI.C. NO. 034642
StatusPublished

This text of Vogler v. Branch Erections Company, Inc. (Vogler v. Branch Erections Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vogler v. Branch Erections Company, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

***********
Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the award, except for some modifications, the Full Commission AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the Industrial Commission and the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction over the parties and this claim. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. The employer-employee relationship existed between the defendant-employer and deceased employee (hereafter decedent) at all relevant times herein.

3. The Goff Group was the workers' compensation carrier on the risk at all relevant times herein.

4. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $614.32, yielding a compensation rate of $409.57 per week.

5. Billy Charles Vogler, the deceased employee, sustained an injury by accident while in the course and scope of his employment with defendant-employer on March 23, 2000, and said injury by accident caused plaintiff's death.

6. Decedent was survived by his wife, Mary Nicole Boone Vogler, his daughter Kristin Dakota Vogler, and stepdaughter Megan Nicole Boone. Decedent was not survived by any other person who was either wholly or partially dependent upon him at the time of his death.

7. The issues to be determined by the Commission are as follows:

a) Whether a ten percent penalty should be assessed against defendant-employer for violations of OSHA regulations;

b) If so, how should the same be paid.

***********
The Pre-Trial Agreement along with its attachments and any stipulations that have been submitted by the parties are hereby incorporated by reference as though they were fully set out herein.

***********
The Full Commission adopts the findings of fact found by the Deputy Commissioner with some modifications and finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On March 23, 2000, decedent suffered a compensable injury by accident while in the course and scope of his employment with defendant-employer when a crane broke loose from its platform and fell, striking decedent and causing him to fall 20 feet to the ground. As a direct result of said injury by accident decedent was killed.

2. At the time of his death, decedent was survived by his wife, Mary Nicole Boone Vogler, to whom he was married on April 3, 1995; his minor daughter Kristin Dakota Vogler, born March 21, 1996; and his stepdaughter Megan Nicole Boone, born June 1, 1994. Mary Nicole Boone Vogler is the natural mother of Kristin Dakota Vogler and Megan Nicole Boone. Decedent was not survived by any other person that was either wholly or partially dependent upon him for their support.

3. OSHA performed an investigation of decedent's March 23, 2000 death by accident and cited defendant-employer for 20 violations of OSHA regulations, all characterized as "serious." The OSHA investigator was of the opinion and the Commission finds that the violations were the proximate cause of decedent's death.

4. The OSHA report indicated that defendant-employer's records showed a failure to inspect the crane turret bolts for two years prior to this incident even though OSHA regulations require a daily inspection of the same when in use. Decedent's death was caused by the crane falling on him as he was working on a section of a communications tower erected 18 feet above ground.

5. The OSHA inspector found that the failure to have the crane and other equipment inspected resulted in defendant-employer's failure to discover worn, cracked, and rusty bolts on the turret which caused the crane to fall on decedent. The inspector further stated:

"According to the crane operator he heard a snap, then the crane boom started to fall, striking the employee [decedent] on the top leg of the tower section. The csho [Safety/Health Compliance Officer] observed that the bolts holding the upper and lower portions of the turret had sheared off. Upon closer examination many bolts showed signs of rust, indicative of cracks. Turret bolts could also be turned by hand, and the csho removed twenty two bolts using no tools. Maintenance records for the crane indicated that in the last two years the crane had not been inspected. Crane operators were not trained. Operators did not inspect the crane prior to, and during use. Severity is high due to death from crushing. Probability is also high due to the continuous use of the crane. NOTE: VIOLATION WAS PROXIMATE CAUSE OF ACCIDENT."

6. The inspector also found that defendant-employer did not prevent its employees from working under a moving crane and provided no training to employees who were exposed to fall hazards while assembling and installing section of the telecommunications tower. In addition, defendant-employer did not provide a safety net below decedent nor was decedent wearing a safety harness, and these safety violations also contributed to decedent's death.

7. Defendant-employer did not have in place established written safety rules for its employees.

8. The OSHA inspection revealed that defendant-employer knew or should have been aware of the safety hazards that existed at the job site because the violations were in plain view. Defendant-employer failed to conduct inspections of the crane, rigging equipment, fall protection and general worksite conditions, which resulted in the fatality on March 23, 2000.

***********
Based upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Full Commission concludes as follows:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Deceased employee was killed as a result of an injury by accident arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment with defendant-employer on March 23, 2000. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(6).

2. Plaintiffs are entitled to the payment of the medical expenses incurred for the treatment of decedent's injuries sustained as a result of the injury by accident. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-25.

3. Mary Nicole Boone Vogler, Kristen Dakota Vogler and Megan Nicole Boone were wholly dependent upon decedent at the time of his death and are therefore entitled to the death benefits, share and share alike. N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 97-38, -39. Decedent did not leave any other persons who were either wholly or partially dependent upon decedent for support. Therefore, Mary Nicole Boone Vogler, Kristen Dakota Vogler and Megan Nicole Boone are the only persons entitled to take the death benefits in this matter. Mary Nicole Boone Vogler is the mother and natural guardian of the two minor children, Kristen Dakota Vogler and Megan Nicole Boone.

4. Decedent's average weekly wage at the time of the injury by accident was $614.32, yielding a compensation rate of $409.57 per week.

5. Mary Nicole Boone Vogler is entitled to receive one-third of the death benefits at the rate of $136.52 per week for 400 weeks beginning March 24, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brewer v. Harris
182 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
Beck v. Carolina Power and Light Co.
291 S.E.2d 897 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vogler v. Branch Erections Company, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogler-v-branch-erections-company-inc-ncworkcompcom-2002.