Vogel v. Vogel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vogel v. Vogel

175 So. 2d 593, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4222

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 1965

DocketNo. 64-921

StatusPublished

This text of 175 So. 2d 593 (Vogel v. Vogel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vogel v. Vogel, 175 So. 2d 593, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4222 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a divorce decree the appellant-husband contends it was error to require him to pay the wife’s attorney fees and that the alimony allowance was excessive. The appellee-wife on cross assignment contends it was error to decree the cancellation of certain deeds from the husband to her. We have considered these several contentions of the parties in the light of the record and briefs, and we conclude that no reversible error has been shown.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a divorce decree the appellant-husband contends it was error to require him to pay the wife’s attorney fees and that the alimony allowance was excessive. The appellee-wife on cross assignment contends it was error to decree the cancellation of certain deeds from the husband to her. We have considered these several contentions of the parties in the light of the record and briefs, and we conclude that no reversible error has been shown.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 So. 2d 593, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogel-v-vogel-fladistctapp-1965.