Vogel v. Union Dime Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vogel v. Union Dime Savings Bank

221 A.D. 881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 221 A.D. 881 (Vogel v. Union Dime Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vogel v. Union Dime Savings Bank, 221 A.D. 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

The parties having stipulated in writing that this case may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. We are of opinion that upon the facts here the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies, and that the plaintiff’s evidence called for some explanation by the defendant as to the cause of the collapse of the glass panel in the door. Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties having stipulated in writing that this case may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. We are of opinion that upon the facts here the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies, and that the plaintiff’s evidence called for some explanation by the defendant as to the cause of the collapse of the glass panel in the door. Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogel-v-union-dime-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack