Vogel v. Smith

371 So. 2d 719, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15259
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1979·No. No. 79-16·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant/plaintiff takes this interlocutory appeal from a non-final order directing the release of $3500 from the registry of the Circuit Court to a non-party movant. We reverse.

The trial court committed reversible error by authorizing the release of monies deposited in the court registry to one who was not a party to the action below. A non-party had no standing to make such a motion:

“ ‘Persons who are not parties of record to a suit have no standing therein which will enable them to take part in or control the proceedings. If they have occasion to ask relief in relation to the matters involved, they must either contrive to obtain the status of parties in such suit or they must institute an independent suit’.”

Warshaw-Seattle, Inc. v. Clark, 85 So.2d 623, 625 (Fla.1955).

The trial court has discretion to allow an interested party to intervene below and assert a claim under these circumstances. See Miracle House Corporation v. Haige, 96 So.2d 417 (Fla.1957); Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Millis, 352 So.2d 585 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); cert. denied, 360 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1978); Coral Bay Property Owners’ Association v. City of Coral Gables, 305 So.2d 853 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); and Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.230.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vogel v. Smith, 371 So. 2d 719, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15259 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

371 So. 2d 719 (Vogel v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hidden Wealth, Inc. v. Royal Petroleum, Inc.
453 So. 2d 106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)