Vogel v. Little Rock

15 S.W. 836, 54 Ark. 335, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 46
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 14, 1891·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Hemingway, J.

As the territory described in the city ordinance was contiguous to the city of Little Rock, its passage was within the power of the city council, and the demurrer to the petition for certiorari was properly sustained for this reason, if for no other.

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vogel v. Little Rock, 15 S.W. 836, 54 Ark. 335, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 46 (Ark. 1891).

15 S.W. 836 (Vogel v. Little Rock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anne Arundel County v. City of Annapolis
721 A.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1998)
State v. City of North Kansas City
228 S.W.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1950)
City of Newport v. Owens
211 S.W.2d 438 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1948)
Hobart v. City of Minneapolis
166 N.W. 411 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1918)
International & G. N. R. v. Boles
161 S.W. 914 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Clardy v. State
131 S.W. 46 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)