Vogel v. Little Rock

15 S.W. 836, 54 Ark. 335, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 46
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 14, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 15 S.W. 836 (Vogel v. Little Rock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vogel v. Little Rock, 15 S.W. 836, 54 Ark. 335, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 46 (Ark. 1891).

Opinion

Hemingway, J.

As the territory described in the city ordinance was contiguous to the city of Little Rock, its passage was within the power of the city council, and the demurrer to the petition for certiorari was properly sustained for this reason, if for no other.

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anne Arundel County v. City of Annapolis
721 A.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1998)
State v. City of North Kansas City
228 S.W.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1950)
City of Newport v. Owens
211 S.W.2d 438 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1948)
Hobart v. City of Minneapolis
166 N.W. 411 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1918)
International & G. N. R. v. Boles
161 S.W. 914 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Clardy v. State
131 S.W. 46 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.W. 836, 54 Ark. 335, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogel-v-little-rock-ark-1891.