Vogel v. Laiso

252 A.D. 894, 300 N.Y.S. 180, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6711
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 1937·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action, judgment of the County Court of Rockland county in favor of the plaintiff reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Plaintiff was a passenger in the taxicab owned by the defendant. In alighting, she put her hand on the metal upright post between the front and the rear doors. While she was in that position, another passenger, who had alighted before her, slammed the door, injuring plaintiff’s fingers that were around the upright post. The law imposed no duty on the driver to anticipate the unusual happening. Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vogel v. Laiso, 252 A.D. 894, 300 N.Y.S. 180, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

252 A.D. 894 (Vogel v. Laiso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. Otis
190 A.D.2d 1056 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Harvey v. Auto Interurban Co.
220 P.2d 890 (Washington Supreme Court, 1950)
A & A Cab Operating Co. v. Drake
1948 OK 53 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1948)
Dufresne v. City Taxi, Inc.
258 A.D. 1057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)