Vogel v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.

254 A.D. 479, 5 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6454
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The extracts from the stenographer’s minutes indicate that plaintiff had not rested. Since the trial justice said at the time of the adjournment that he intended to communicate with counsel for the purpose of setting the case down for a further hearing he should have done so. No further proceedings were had and no notice was given to counsel and still the judgment as entered contains a recital which reads in part, “ and the defendant * * * having moved at the close of plaintiff’s case to dismiss the complaint.” Furthermore, there was no waiver on the part of plaintiff to submit further evidence or, if so advised, to make appropriate motions with reference to the pleadings. Consequently, the motion to resettle the order for judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits and to amend the judgment should have been granted.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

[480]*480Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vogel v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co., 254 A.D. 479, 5 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

254 A.D. 479 (Vogel v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vogel v. Harriman National Bank
256 A.D. 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)