Vogan v. Caminetti

4 P. 435, 65 Cal. 438, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 589
California Supreme Court·Decided July 26, 1884·No. No. 9,223·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The Court.

The object of the transaction between the deceased Vogan and the deceased Shipman being to indemnify Vogan for the liabilities he had incurred and might incur on Shipman’s account, the amount of the mortgage and note served only to limit the extent of the security. Upon the foreclosure of that mortgage, the amount for which judgment was rendered was, properly, the amount the mortgagee had paid under the liability for which he was secured, with interest from the day of payment. (Jones on Mort. vol. 1, § 384.)

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vogan v. Caminetti, 4 P. 435, 65 Cal. 438, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 589 (Cal. 1884).

4 P. 435 (Vogan v. Caminetti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norden v. McCallister
184 S.W.2d 459 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1945)
W. P. Fuller & Co. v. McClure
291 P. 1027 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
Fernandez v. Tormey
53 P. 1119 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Turman v. Forrester
18 S.W. 167 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1892)