Voessler v. Palm Fetchteler & Co.

5 A.2d 753, 122 N.J.L. 434, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 333
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 21, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 A.2d 753 (Voessler v. Palm Fetchteler & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Voessler v. Palm Fetchteler & Co., 5 A.2d 753, 122 N.J.L. 434, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 333 (N.J. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court. Under its seventh point the appellant calls our attention to Pamph. L. 1938, ch. 198, p. 474 (R. S. 34:15-94, 95 and 95.1). This amendment was approved May 18th, 1938, and went into effect immediately. The cause here under consideration was submitted to the Supreme Court at the May term, 1938. The amendment does not affect the judgment in this cause because it is not retroactive.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heiler, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wexler v. Lambrecht Foods
166 A.2d 576 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.2d 753, 122 N.J.L. 434, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voessler-v-palm-fetchteler-co-nj-1939.