Voda v. Medtronic, Inc.
This text of Voda v. Medtronic, Inc. (Voda v. Medtronic, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
JAN K. VODA, M.D., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant,
v.
MEDTRONIC, INC., AND MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., Defendants-Appellants. ______________________
2013-1045, -1053 ______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma in No. 09-CV-0095, Senior Judge Leonard Tim. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MITCHELL G. STOCKWELL, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for plaintiff- cross-appellant. With him on the brief were D. CLAY HOLLOWAY, ALYSON L. WOOTEN and RICHARD W. GOLDSTUCKER. Of counsel on the brief was JOHN A. KENNEY, McAffee & Taft, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
MARK C. FLEMING, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defend- ants-appellants. With him on the brief were LAUREN B. FLETCHER, SARAH B. PETTY, and SHIRLEY X. LI CANTIN. Of counsel on the brief was MICHAEL SIMONS, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, of Austin, Texas. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Voda v. Medtronic, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voda-v-medtronic-inc-cafc-2013.