Vo v. Bui
This text of 680 So. 2d 601 (Vo v. Bui) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bang Thi VO, Appellant,
v.
Trung Quang BUI, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Donald R. Gillette, Tampa, for Appellant.
Nina M. Hanson and Catherine W. Real of Muga & Real, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The order in this case, requiring the wife to undergo a psychological evaluation, is not an appealable nonfinal order. See Pariser v. Pariser, 601 So.2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Because the alleged harm will not be remediable on appeal, we treat the instant case as a petition for writ of certiorari. Pariser. We conclude that the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law; therefore, we deny the writ. See Elder v. Carter, 670 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
PARKER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
680 So. 2d 601, 1996 WL 539508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vo-v-bui-fladistctapp-1996.