VME GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC, etc. v. THE GRAND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 2, 2020
Docket20-1622
StatusPublished

This text of VME GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC, etc. v. THE GRAND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., etc. (VME GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC, etc. v. THE GRAND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
VME GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC, etc. v. THE GRAND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed December 2, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1622 Lower Tribunal No. 17-25120 ________________

VME Group International, LLC, etc., et al., Petitioners,

vs.

The Grand Condominium Association, Inc., etc., et al., Respondents.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Prohibition.

Law Offices of Karen J. Haas, and Karen J. Haas, for petitioners.

Roniel Rodriguez, IV, P.A., and Roniel Rodriguez, IV; Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Scott A. Cole, for respondents.

Before EMAS, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. VME Group International, LLC files a petition for writ of prohibition, seeking

review of the trial court’s order denying VME’s motion for disqualification of the

trial judge.

The petition is based upon documented activity occurring in August of 2018.

The motion to disqualify was filed in September of 2020. Neither the motion nor its

attachments contain any averment or allegation regarding when these facts were

discovered, nor any averment or allegation (save for a conclusory statement) that the

motion was filed in a timely manner. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(e) (providing:

“A motion to disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days

after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion . . . ”). See State

v. Oliu, 183 So. 3d 1161, 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (stating: “While these allegations

give rise to an objectively reasonable fear of bias or prejudice requiring

disqualification of the trial judge, we are compelled to deny the petition for writ of

prohibition because the motion to disqualify the trial judge was not timely filed.”)

Although we are compelled to deny the petition, we note that the Florida Rules

of Judicial Administration permit a judge to enter an order of disqualification on her

own initiative. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i) (providing: “Judge’s Initiative.

Nothing in this rule limits the judge’s authority to enter an order of disqualification

on the judge’s own initiative”); Oliu, 183 So. 3d 1163.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Oliu
183 So. 3d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
P.R., a child v. State of Florida
183 So. 3d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
VME GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC, etc. v. THE GRAND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vme-group-international-llc-etc-v-the-grand-condominium-association-fladistctapp-2020.