Vliet, Inc. v. Rowe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vliet, Inc. v. Rowe

261 A.D. 868, 24 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7830

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 868 (Vliet, Inc. v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vliet, Inc. v. Rowe, 261 A.D. 868, 24 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

— - This is an appeal from an order and judgment, which order denied the motion of the plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings and granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed the complaint in the action. The action was for a declaratory judgment to determine the validity of certain assessments [869]*869made by the assessors of the town of Colonie during the years 1933 through 1939, inclusive, against property now owned by the plaintiff and operated by persons other than the plaintiff. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed. (Miller v. City of Oneida, 153 Misc. 438; People ex rel. Herzog v. Miller, 170 id. 1063; People ex rel. H. R. Day Line v. Franck, 257 N. Y. 69, 71; Smith v. The Mayor, 68 id. 552.) Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffeman, Sehenck and Poster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— - This is an appeal from an order and judgment, which order denied the motion of the plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings and granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed the complaint in the action. The action was for a declaratory judgment to determine the validity of certain assessments [869]*869made by the assessors of the town of Colonie during the years 1933 through 1939, inclusive, against property now owned by the plaintiff and operated by persons other than the plaintiff. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed. (Miller v. City of Oneida, 153 Misc. 438; People ex rel. Herzog v. Miller, 170 id. 1063; People ex rel. H. R. Day Line v. Franck, 257 N. Y. 69, 71; Smith v. The Mayor, 68 id. 552.) Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffeman, Sehenck and Poster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 868, 24 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vliet-inc-v-rowe-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack