Vliet, III v. Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop
This text of Vliet, III v. Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop (Vliet, III v. Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 06-JUN-2025 08:34 AM Dkt. 66 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
ANDREW J. VLIET, III, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP doing business as KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS, ELLIOT K. MILLS, in his capacity as Trustee of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop; CRYSTAL K. ROSE, in her capacity as Trustee of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop; JENNIFER N. GOODYEAR-KAʻŌPUA, in her capacity as Trustee of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop; MICHELLE KAʻUHANE, in her capacity as Trustee of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop; and ROBERT K.W.H. NOBRIGA, in his capacity as Trustee of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Defendants/Cross-claimants/Cross-claim-Defendants-Appellants, and RICHARD D. GRONNA, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ROBERT MCCORMICK BROWNE, Defendant-Appellee; ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant/Cross-claim- Defendant/Cross-claimant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 2-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-20; DOE NON-PROFIT ENTITIES 1-20, and DOE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-20, Defendants.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CC161000574)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Nakasone, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Guidry, JJ.)
Defendants/Cross-claimants/Cross-claim-Defendants-
Appellants Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop doing
business as Kamehameha Schools appeal from the Circuit Court of NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
the First Circuit's May 23, 2022 order granting Defendant/Cross-
claim-Defendant/Cross-claimant-Appellee St. Francis Medical
Center's petition for determination of good faith settlement and
Plaintiff-Appellee Andrew J. Vliet, III's (Vliet) joinder (Good
Faith Settlement Order). 1
For a brief background, Vliet sued Kamehameha Schools
and St. Francis pursuant to Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 657-
1.8 (2016), which permits certain actions "for recovery of
damages based on physical, psychological, or other injury or
condition suffered by a minor arising from the sexual abuse of
the minor by any person" that would otherwise be time-barred.
Vliet identified Robert McCormick Browne (Dr. Browne), formerly
employed as Chief of Psychiatry at St. Francis, as having
sexually abused him when he was a student at Kamehameha Schools.
Kamehameha Schools filed a cross-claim against
St. Francis. St. Francis filed its answer and a cross-claim
against Kamehameha Schools. Kamehameha Schools then filed a
cross-claim against Dr. Browne's Estate. 2 According to the court
minutes, Vliet entered into separate settlement agreements with
both St. Francis and Kamehameha Schools. St. Francis then
petitioned for a determination of good faith settlement, which
1 The Honorable Dean E. Ochiai presided.
2 Dr. Browne is deceased and his Estate is a nominal party in this appeal.
2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
was granted. The circuit court entered its Good Faith
Settlement Order. Kamehameha Schools appealed from that order.
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs
submitted by the parties, and having given due consideration to
the issues raised and the arguments advanced, we resolve the
points of error as discussed below and affirm.
Kamehameha Schools contends the circuit court erred in
concluding that, under HRS § 663-15.5 (2016), the good faith
settlement between Vliet and St. Francis barred Kamehameha
Schools' cross-claims for breach of contract, negligence,
indemnification, and attorneys' fees pursuant to Uyemura v.
Wick, 57 Haw. 102, 551 P.2d 171 (1976).
When a court determines a settlement was made in good
faith, HRS § 663-15.5(d) bars joint tortfeasors from making
claims against the settling tortfeasor except for claims based
on a written indemnity agreement:
(d) A determination by the court that a settlement was made in good faith shall:
(1) Bar any other joint tortfeasor . . . from any further claims against the settling tortfeasor . . . except those based on a written indemnity agreement; and
(2) Result in a dismissal of all cross-claims filed against the settling joint tortfeasor . . . except those based on a written indemnity agreement.
HRS § 663-15.5(d) (formatting altered).
3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Here, Kamehameha Schools' cross-claims, including its
breach of contract and Uyemura claims, arise out of the
"original injury" to Vliet caused by Dr. Browne's abuse and are
"directly or indirectly" in the nature of contribution and
indemnity claims. See Abad v. Griffith, 155 Hawaiʻi 223, 560
P.3d 478, Nos. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, 2024 WL
5088457, at *5 (App. Dec. 12, 2024) (SDO) (concluding the
approval of a good faith settlement "requires dismissal of only
those crossclaims against a settling joint tortfeasor raised in
the capacity of a joint tortfeasor, i.e., those seeking
contribution or indemnity (directly or indirectly) for the
injury (to the complainant) that is the subject of the good
faith settlement").
The circuit court dismissed all cross-claims and
third-party claims "now pending" against St. Francis and barred
"any further claims" against St. Francis "in connection with
this litigation, except those based upon a written indemnity
agreement." The circuit court's dismissal of Kamehameha
Schools' cross-claims against St. Francis, and its discharge of
St. Francis "from any and all liability for any contribution to
any other party, joint tortfeasor and/or co-obligor[,]" is
consistent with the underlying purpose of HRS § 663-15.5 -
4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
protecting settling tortfeasors from contribution claims brought
by other joint tortfeasors. See id.
Thus, the circuit did not err in concluding that the
good faith settlement between Vliet and St. Francis barred
Kamehameha Schools' cross-claims for breach of contract,
negligence, indemnification, and attorneys' fees.
Based on the foregoing, we affirm the circuit court's
May 23, 2022 Good Faith Settlement Order.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 6, 2025.
On the briefs: /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Presiding Judge Paul Alston, William S. Hunt, /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Nickolas A. Kacprowski, Associate Judge Claire Wong Black, (Dentons), and /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Kelly G. Laporte, Associate Judge Amanda M. Jones, Michi Momose, Trisha H.S.T. Akagi, (Cades Schutte), for Defendants/Cross- claimants/Cross-claim- Defendants-Appellants.
Terence J. O'Toole, Andrew J. Lautenbach, Kukui Claydon, (Starn O'Toole Marcus & Fisher), and Arthur F. Roeca, Jodie D.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vliet, III v. Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vliet-iii-v-trustees-of-the-estate-of-bernice-pauahi-bishop-hawapp-2025.