Vlautin v. Bumpus

California Supreme Court

Vlautin v. Bumpus

35 Cal. 214

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1868

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 35 Cal. 214 (Vlautin v. Bumpus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vlautin v. Bumpus, 35 Cal. 214 (Cal. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, Sawyer, C. J. :

The appeal is from the judgment in an action on a promissory note, without any statement. It does not appear when the payment on the note, admitted and allowed, was made, and it is, therefore, impossible to tell from the judgment roll whether the judgment is for too large a sum or not.

The only other point made, is, that the common property of husband and wife is not liable for the sole debt of the wife, created before her marriage. But it is otherwise settled in Van Maren v. Johnson, 15 Cal. 308.

Judgment affirmed, and the remittitur directed to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, Sawyer, C. J. :

The appeal is from the judgment in an action on a promissory note, without any statement. It does not appear when the payment on the note, admitted and allowed, was made, and it is, therefore, impossible to tell from the judgment roll whether the judgment is for too large a sum or not.

The only other point made, is, that the common property of husband and wife is not liable for the sole debt of the wife, created before her marriage. But it is otherwise settled in Van Maren v. Johnson, 15 Cal. 308.

Judgment affirmed, and the remittitur directed to issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Cal. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vlautin-v-bumpus-cal-1868.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack