Vizzacco v. Priscilla Worsted Mills

86 A.2d 657, 79 R.I. 222, 1952 R.I. LEXIS 34
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedFebruary 27, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 A.2d 657 (Vizzacco v. Priscilla Worsted Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vizzacco v. Priscilla Worsted Mills, 86 A.2d 657, 79 R.I. 222, 1952 R.I. LEXIS 34 (R.I. 1952).

Opinion

Condon, J.

This petition for certiorari was allowed to be filed on the ground that there was doubt whether petitioner had an adequate remedy by appeal to this court to review a certain decree of the superior court dismissing her claim of appeal in a workmen’s compensation case. After the writ [223]*223issued and the record in the case was certified here, petitioner perfected an appeal from the decree complained of, which appeal was sustained by our opinion filed this day. Priscilla Worsted Mills v. Vizzacco, 79 R. I. 217. Therefore it is unnecessary to further consider the instant petition.

Luigi Capasso, for petitioner. Boss & Conlan, John T. Keenan, for respondent.

For the above reason only, the petition is denied and dismissed, the writ heretofore issued is quashed, and the record certified thereunder is ordered sent back to the superior court with our decision endorsed thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryave v. Ryave
375 A.2d 766 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A.2d 657, 79 R.I. 222, 1952 R.I. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vizzacco-v-priscilla-worsted-mills-ri-1952.