Vivolo v. Catalfumo
This text of 24 A.D.2d 582 (Vivolo v. Catalfumo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, in which the defendant interposed, as a defense, that plaintiff’s claim had been duly released in writing, the defendants appeal from a resettled order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 20, 1964, which denied their motion for a separate and prior trial on the issue of general release raised by their defense. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (Mosher v. Mitchell, 22 A D 2d 805, and eases there cited). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.2d 582, 262 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vivolo-v-catalfumo-nyappdiv-1965.