Vivint, Inc. v. alarm.com Inc.
This text of Vivint, Inc. v. alarm.com Inc. (Vivint, Inc. v. alarm.com Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
VIVINT, INC., Appellant
v.
ALARM.COM INC., Appellee ______________________
2017-2112 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015- 01965. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ROBERT GREENE STERNE, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JASON DANIEL EISENBERG, ADAM LAROCK.
TEENA-ANN V. SANKOORIKAL, Levine Lee LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by RICHARD J. STARK, Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY; WILLIAM MANDIR, DAVID PHILLIP EMERY, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vivint, Inc. v. alarm.com Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vivint-inc-v-alarmcom-inc-cafc-2018.