Vivenzio v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vivenzio v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

256 A.D. 826, 9 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5036

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 826 (Vivenzio v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vivenzio v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 256 A.D. 826, 9 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover on an industrial policy of life insurance, it is established that the insured was attended by a physician for the condition of hypertension and arteriosclerosis less than a year before the issuance of the policy, and that the insured died about a year after such medical attendance from an illness of which the aforesaid ailments were the underlying cause. In the Municipal Court of the City of New York, on the verdict of a jury, the plaintiff recovered a judgment. On appeal the Appellate Term reversed the judgment and dismissed the complaint. By permission the plaintiff appeals from the order of the Appellate Term. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover on an industrial policy of life insurance, it is established that the insured was attended by a physician for the condition of hypertension and arteriosclerosis less than a year before the issuance of the policy, and that the insured died about a year after such medical attendance from an illness of which the aforesaid ailments were the underlying cause. In the Municipal Court of the City of New York, on the verdict of a jury, the plaintiff recovered a judgment. On appeal the Appellate Term reversed the judgment and dismissed the complaint. By permission the plaintiff appeals from the order of the Appellate Term. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 826, 9 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vivenzio-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1939.