Vivatson v. Haugen
This text of 2014 ND 215 (Vivatson v. Haugen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/18/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2014 ND 215
Kelsey Vivatson, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Joshua Haugen, Defendant and Appellee
and
State of North Dakota, Real Party in Interest
No. 20140005
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable H. Patrick Weir, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Rhiannon L. Gorham, P.O. Box 6306, Grand Forks, ND 58206-0306, for plaintiff and appellant.
Kari R. Winning, 315 First Avenue North, P.O. Box 5788, Grand Forks, ND 58206-5788, for defendant and appellee.
Vivatson v. Haugen
[¶1] Kelsey Vivatson appeals from a district court judgment awarding Joshua Haugen primary residential responsibility of their minor child. Vivatson argues the district court erred in applying the best interest factors and in awarding primary residential responsibility to Haugen. We conclude the court’s findings on the best interest factors and its determination to award Haugen primary residential responsibility of the child were not clearly erroneous, and we affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 ND 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vivatson-v-haugen-nd-2014.