Vivas v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.

138 So. 3d 479, 2014 WL 860761, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3072
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 2014·No. No. 3D13-465·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because we agree with the trial court that the insurer did not wrongfully cause the insureds to resort to litigation, we affirm the trial court’s denial of attorney’s fees and costs. See generally Beverly v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co., 50 So.3d 628, 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (quoting Clifton v. United Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., 31 So.3d 826, 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)) (“[A]n insurer’s post-suit payment of additional policy proceeds entitles the insured to section 627.428 attorney’s fees where the insurer ‘wrongfully caus[ed] its insured to resort to litigation in order to resolve a conflict with its insurer when it was within the company’s power to resolve it.’ ”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vivas v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co., 138 So. 3d 479, 2014 WL 860761, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3072 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

138 So. 3d 479 (Vivas v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Omega Insurance Co. v. Johnson
207 So. 3d 245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)