Vitto v. Home Bank
23 So. 3d 1054, 9 La.App. 3 Cir. 542, 2009 La. App. LEXIS 1873, 2009 WL 3617701
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vitto v. Home Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 La.App. 3 Cir. 758 →
Opinion
For the reasons discussed in the companion case in this consolidated matter, Vitto v. Davis, 09-498 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/4/09), 23 So.3d 1048, the two trial judgments granting summary judgment in favor of National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Company and dismissing Weldon Vitto, Sr.’s claims against it with prejudice are affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against Weldon Vitto, Sr.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vitto v. Home Bank, 23 So. 3d 1054, 9 La.App. 3 Cir. 542, 2009 La. App. LEXIS 1873, 2009 WL 3617701 (La. Ct. App. 2009).
23 So. 3d 1054 (Vitto v. Home Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vitto v. Davis
23 So. 3d 1048 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New Orleans
118 So. 841 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)