Vitterio v. St. Regis Paper Co.

202 A.D. 775
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam:

We think that neither information was sufficient to give the justice jurisdiction to issue the warrant, and that the plaintiff made out a cause of action against the defendant, upon the theory that it instigated and carried forward the proceedings, but we are of the opinion that the amount of damages awarded is excessive. No damages should be allowed except such as arose from the unlawful imprisonment. The testimony that the plaintiff paid $350 for attorney’s fees and cigars was clearly incompetent and should not have been received. All concur, Davis, J., in result, in a separate memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vitterio v. St. Regis Paper Co., 202 A.D. 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

202 A.D. 775 (Vitterio v. St. Regis Paper Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kajtazi v. Kajtazi
488 F. Supp. 15 (E.D. New York, 1978)
Regan v. Morgan
211 A.D. 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Vittorio v. St. Regis Paper Co.
209 A.D. 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)