Vitram Realty Corp. v. Clement H. Smith & Son, Inc.
248 A.D. 582
Opinion
Order, so far as appealed from, denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first affirmative defense in the answer of defendants-respondents, on the ground that it is insufficient in law, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vitram Realty Corp. v. Clement H. Smith & Son, Inc., 248 A.D. 582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 582 (Vitram Realty Corp. v. Clement H. Smith & Son, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.