Vito L. Affatati, Libelant-Appellant v. The Havbor, the Havtor, the Havprings, the Havkong, the Havorn and the Havfalk
This text of 238 F.2d 388 (Vito L. Affatati, Libelant-Appellant v. The Havbor, the Havtor, the Havprings, the Havkong, the Havorn and the Havfalk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
238 F.2d 388
Vito L. AFFATATI, Libelant-Appellant,
v.
THE HAVBOR, THE HAVTOR, THE HAVPRINGS, THE HAVKONG, THE HAVORN and THE HAVFALK, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 30.
Docket 24087.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued October 3, 1956.
Decided October 25, 1956.
Philip Brown, New York City (Bernard Meyerson, Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for libelant-appellant.
Galli & Locker, New York City (Patrick J. McCann and Patrick E. Gibbons, New York City, of counsel), for respondents-appellees.
Before FRANK, MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant asks us to upset the trial judge's pivotal findings. We think those findings were not clearly erroneous. We affirm on the judge's findings and opinion, D.C., 146 F.Supp. 49.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 F.2d 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vito-l-affatati-libelant-appellant-v-the-havbor-the-havtor-the-ca2-1956.