Vito L. Affatati, Libelant-Appellant v. The Havbor, the Havtor, the Havprings, the Havkong, the Havorn and the Havfalk

238 F.2d 388
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 25, 1956·No. 24087_1·Published

Opinion

238 F.2d 388

Vito L. AFFATATI, Libelant-Appellant,
v.
THE HAVBOR, THE HAVTOR, THE HAVPRINGS, THE HAVKONG, THE HAVORN and THE HAVFALK, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 30.

Docket 24087.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued October 3, 1956.

Decided October 25, 1956.

Philip Brown, New York City (Bernard Meyerson, Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for libelant-appellant.

Galli & Locker, New York City (Patrick J. McCann and Patrick E. Gibbons, New York City, of counsel), for respondents-appellees.

Before FRANK, MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asks us to upset the trial judge's pivotal findings. We think those findings were not clearly erroneous. We affirm on the judge's findings and opinion, D.C., 146 F.Supp. 49.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vito L. Affatati, Libelant-Appellant v. The Havbor, the Havtor, the Havprings, the Havkong, the Havorn and the Havfalk, 238 F.2d 388 (2d Cir. 1956).

238 F.2d 388 (Vito L. Affatati, Libelant-Appellant v. The Havbor, the Havtor, the Havprings, the Havkong, the Havorn and the Havfalk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Affatati v. The Havfalk
146 F. Supp. 49 (E.D. New York, 1955)