Vitek v. D'Agostino
This text of 154 A.D.2d 527 (Vitek v. D'Agostino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action for the partition and sale of real property, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Dickinson, J.), dated July 12, 1988, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We find that the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The affidavits of the parties raise issues that should be resolved at a trial. Mangano, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A.D.2d 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vitek-v-dagostino-nyappdiv-1989.