Vitarelle v. Vitarelle

65 A.D.3d 1035, 884 N.Y.S.2d 889
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 8, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— In an action to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property, the plaintiff Richard T. Vitarelle, Sr., appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenburgh, J.), dated December 5, 2006, as, on consent, awarded possession of the subject premises to the defendant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff consented to the portion of the judgment appealed from which awarded possession of the subject premises to the defendant. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from a judgment entered upon the consent of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Shteierman v Shteierman, 29 AD3d 810 [2006]; Ryan Mgt. Corp. v Cataffo, 278 AD2d 217, 218 [2000]). Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Covello and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vitarelle v. Vitarelle, 65 A.D.3d 1035, 884 N.Y.S.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

65 A.D.3d 1035 (Vitarelle v. Vitarelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vitarelle v. Vitarelle
89 A.D.3d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)